JABS Forum
JABS Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
 All Forums
 JABS Forum
 Experience and Support
 Cervarix
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 5

jennyr

411 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2008 :  16:17:06  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Why do you think it is okay to make derogatory comments about people, thomasp? What makes you think you have a right to verbally abuse people? Do you accept that in a democracy people have a right to express an opinion, even if it is controversial? Or are you suggesting that, when it comes to medical opinion and pharmaceutical drugs, dissenting opinion is all "credulous nonsense." I find your tone and attitude contemptible.
Go to Top of Page

GUS THE FUSS

United Kingdom
1465 Posts

Posted - 10/11/2008 :  21:26:18  Show Profile  Visit GUS THE FUSS's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Exactly Jennie

Anonymous Dr Tom P (P for poison) of LT /RT
Anyone/thing/it that Laughs’ at the meaning of special disabled kids is twisted and evil

thomas p
United Kingdom
205 Posts Posted - 09/04/2008 : 13:10:36
________________________________________
quote:
________________________________________
Originally posted by Seonaid
[br]Well I've come into contact with him plenty - and I don't need or want your commiserations thank you. Nor do his family. Gus is a very special human being
________________________________________


Anonymous Dr Tom P (P for poison) of LT /RT
QUOTE
Is that "special" as in special school?UN QUOTE



http://www.jabs.org.uk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2848&whichpage=3&SearchTerms=special%2Cneeds


MMR RIP


Edited by - GUS THE FUSS on 10/11/2008 21:26:58
Go to Top of Page

thomas p

United Kingdom
314 Posts

Posted - 10/15/2008 :  11:58:46  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Actually, Jenny, I made a derogatory comment about the stuff suba posts here.
Read what I wrote in the post just before, I am clearly and specifically saying that Suba's posts and his sources are rubbish, I make no mention of the character, intelligence or anything else of the man.

Oh, and if I were typing abuse at someone, surely that would be textually abusing them, rather than verbally abusing them.
Go to Top of Page

Wanda

United Kingdom
133 Posts

Posted - 10/15/2008 :  12:18:40  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
[i]Originally posted by thomas p[/i]
[br]Actually, Jenny, I made a derogatory comment about the stuff suba posts here.
Read what I wrote in the post just before, I am clearly and specifically saying that Suba's posts and his sources are rubbish, I make no mention of the character, intelligence or anything else of the man.

Oh, and if I were typing abuse at someone, surely that would be textually abusing them, rather than verbally abusing them.



So we now have a pedantic textual abuser in our midst.

Edited by - Wanda on 10/15/2008 12:19:30
Go to Top of Page

MinorityView

USA
611 Posts

Posted - 10/15/2008 :  13:56:40  Show Profile  Visit MinorityView's Homepage  Reply with Quote
sorry, but pedantic textual abuser is NAME CALLING.

Hair splitting dancing around is not NAME CALLING. So Thomas is okay and...

I'm not going there.

I appreciate people making an attempt to be courteous and concentrate on the content not the person.

But Thomas, your contempt for the person does show through, even when you are carefully concentrating on the topic. You've got the idea pretty well, but not quite the practice. Keep trying.

I'd be delighted in a decrease in the name calling in this forum. True, people who enjoy mocking the parents of disabled children are a particularly low species of human (not referring to anyone in particular) but why sink to their level?

Aged survivor of many years of alternative health care...and one vaccine, administered by a doctor without the consent of my parents, 50 years ago.
Go to Top of Page

thomas p

United Kingdom
314 Posts

Posted - 10/15/2008 :  14:46:03  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Oh no, MV, you've got it all wrong.
I have nothing but the utmost respect and admiration for anyone who can claim that conspiracy theories about how the illuminati are depopulating the planet using medicines and how AIDS was created by the WHO to kill Africans are true and apparently do so seriously.

I've always admired great jokers and Suba is clearly a classic in the genre.

Unless, of course, he's serious, in which case then I would have nothing but contempt for the man.
Go to Top of Page

GUS THE FUSS

United Kingdom
1465 Posts

Posted - 10/15/2008 :  21:37:28  Show Profile  Visit GUS THE FUSS's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Says the Dr Tom Pee who loves to ridcule special needs children and the meaning of vaccine damage and all that it stands for...

MMR RIP
Go to Top of Page

jennyr

411 Posts

Posted - 10/24/2008 :  12:22:39  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thomasp read what you wrote:

"Gus - satin? what? you're insane.
whatif, you're clearly unable to understand what i've posted so i';m not going to waste any more time discussing this with you.
suba, since it comes from you, i'm going to base my judgement on past experience and assume that it''s ill-understood scaremongering."

You are trying to tell us that is not abuse with words? However, it is irrelevant because I do not value your opinion at all.

"Oh, and if I were typing abuse at someone, surely that would be textually abusing them, rather than verbally abusing them."

Semantics thomasp - or are you trying to start another little argument?? Too funny.
Go to Top of Page

sara

1 Posts

Posted - 07/16/2009 :  15:07:20  Show Profile  Send sara an AOL message  Reply with Quote
Hi there,

I am writing to find out if anyone has further opinion or experience of Cervarix.

I'm doing some research into it at the moment so am particularly interested in anyone who's recieved leaflets or had advice regarding getting the jab or knows anyone whos had the jab and experienced adverse reactions.

Rather than general debate I'm really trying to find out about peoples specific experiences.

Kind Regards,

Sara
Go to Top of Page

nazrudin

United Kingdom
2 Posts

Posted - 10/07/2009 :  10:35:06  Show Profile  Send nazrudin an AOL message  Reply with Quote
quote:
[i]Originally posted by Suba[/i]
[br]Initial tests using Gardasil, only performed on females were undertaken on 11,00 people between ages 9 and 26 worldwide and found the most common side effect was injection site pain. While Gardasil was being tested in the U.S. before it was licensed, 10 people in the group that received the HPV vaccine and 7 people in the placebo group died during the trials. None of the deaths was considered vaccine-related. Now isn't that a coincidence! Guess what? Aluminium was in the placebo. Now the vaccine does not look so bad as people just drop down all the time as indicated with the placebo. The wonders of modern science!

Go to Top of Page

nazrudin

United Kingdom
2 Posts

Posted - 10/07/2009 :  10:38:07  Show Profile  Send nazrudin an AOL message  Reply with Quote
Hi Suba,

That's very interesting about the deaths from the placebo trial of Gardasil. Would you mind giving me the source of this information as I am writing an article for my children's school about these HPV vaccines.

many thanks

Naz
Go to Top of Page

peter1955

United Kingdom
31 Posts

Posted - 10/07/2009 :  17:27:18  Show Profile  Send peter1955 an AOL message  Reply with Quote
Make sure you get the references to the scientific journals in which the studies were published.

This ensures it's from properly conducted trails.

The recent tragedy in Coventry shows there's a huge difference between 'someone died after the vaccination' and 'someone was killed by the vaccine'

Go to Top of Page

john

United Kingdom
607 Posts

Posted - 10/07/2009 :  18:47:16  Show Profile  Visit john's Homepage  Send john an AOL message  Reply with Quote
Janak does the best Gardasil trial analysis http://www.whale.to/vaccine/janak_h.html
Go to Top of Page

paba

1 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2009 :  10:32:47  Show Profile  Send paba an AOL message  Reply with Quote
My daughter has just had the first of the Cervarix jabs and there are another two to go. Does anyone know if it is safe to just have the one jab and not continue with the others
Go to Top of Page

john

United Kingdom
607 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2009 :  13:38:10  Show Profile  Visit john's Homepage  Send john an AOL message  Reply with Quote
In my opinion it's always the safer option to not vaccinate, as they are dangerous and don't do diddly squat apart from attack your immune system
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/cervarix_h.html
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
JABS Forum © JABS 2009 Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05