Charles and Chris
Everything Is OK
(Don't Take The Swine Flu Jab)

The GMC Hearings

Read more...


Martin Walker writes:

Read more...


US Omnibus Autism Proceeding - MMR/thimerosal-containing vaccines and autism

Read more...


Discover what viruses are, and how vaccines are made: this book explains what doctors don't tell you...


F. Edward Yazbak MD writes:

Read more... NEW


Dr Richard Halvorsen

"I'm not opposed to jabs but there are serious worries"
DAILY MAIL

1ST OCTOBER 2009

Read more...


'Flu jabs for children?
BBC News 4th April '08

BBC Interview .


Barbara Loe Fisher writes:

Read more...


Lucy Johnston writes:

Read more...


Mercury and autism in the UK

Read more...

Reprinted from the Daily Mail, 2nd October 2009

Cervical cancer jab girl died from unrelated chest tumour as researcher calls vaccine plan a 'mass experiment'

By Daniel Martin and David Derbyshire
Last updated at 8:34 AM on 02nd October 2009

Teenager Natalie Morton died from a malignant tumour in her chest and not from a reaction to the cervical cancer jab, it was revealed today.

Deputy coroner for Coventry Louise Hunt told Natalie's parents that the current indication was that the vaccine was not a contributing factor in her death.

Opening and adjourning the inquest at Coventry Magistrates' Court, she said: 'It appears that Natalie died from a tumour in her chest which had spread to her heart and her lungs'.

Natalie, 14, collapsed less than two hours after being given a cervical cancer vaccination at Coventry's Blue Coat Church of England School on Monday.

Pathologist Alexander Kolar told the inquest that Natalie's chest was "heavily infiltrated" by a tumour that had extended to the left lung. 

The growth had compressed Natalie's aorta and pulmonary artery, shutting off the blood supply to her entire body and causing her to collapse.

He said: "It was so severe that death could have arrived at any time." 

Natalie's mother Elaine Bullock and stepfather Andrew Bullock, paid tribute the 14-year-old outside the court.

They said she was a 'kind and fun-loving teenager with a beautiful smile'.

Mr Bullock said: 'Natalie was a wonderful daughter, sister and granddaughter.

'She was kind, fun-loving and had a beautiful smile. Natalie had a strong personal faith in God. We know that she has gone to heaven to be with her saviour, Jesus'.

He added: 'We now know that Natalie's death was the result of a serious underlying medical condition and most probably nothing to do with the vaccine that she had at school on Monday'.

The findings come as the cervical cancer vaccination programme was branded a 'public health experiment' by a senior researcher who helped develop the drug.

Dr Diane Harper - one of the world's leading cervical cancer experts - said health officials and drug firm bosses were exaggerating the jab's benefits.

And she claimed parents were not being properly warned about the 'small but potentially adverse' risks of Cervarix and other vaccines.

But health officials, cancer charities and scientific experts all insist the programme is safe and urged parents and schools not to panic.

Under the Government's cervical cancer programme, Cervarix is being offered to girls between 12 and 18.

It works against two strains of HPV - a sexually transmitted virus that causes 70 per cent of cervical cancer cases.

Yesterday the Department of Health said it had 'great confidence' in the safety of its cervical cancer vaccination programme.

'We have been clear all along that there is no reason to suspend HPV immunisation - the programme against cervical cancer continues today,' a spokesman said.

'We have one of the most successful immunisation programmes in the world and have great confidence in the safety of them.

'Young girls can continue to protect themselves against cervical cancer by having this vaccine.' But Dr Harper, of the University of Missouri-Kansas, who was involved in the clinical trials of Cervarix, believes it should have been tested for another four years before being introduced in Britain.

Patient trials have only been running for seven and a half years - not long enough to show whether it continues protecting women into their late 20s and 30s, she said.

'It is a public health experiment,' she said.

'Parents consenting to HPV vaccination must be told that the duration of the vaccine is unknown, and that it is entirely possible that the initial vaccination series will only postpone, not prevent, future cervical cancers in their daughter,' Dr Harper said.

Around one million girls have been given the vaccine. There have been 4,657 reports of suspected adverse reactions - including sore arms, dizziness and swelling.

Although the drug is safe for the majority of women, there are very rare 'real dangers' - including the risk of brain damage, paralysis and death, Dr Harper said.

Even if the jab is only dangerous for one person in a million, women should be told the risks, she said.

She also believes the benefits of the vaccine as a 'cure' are being exaggerated. The jab does not prevent 30 per cent of cervical cancers - which means women will still need to be screened for pre-cancerous lesions.

Dr Harper helped develop the HPV vaccine which is produced as Cervarix - the GlaxoSmithKline product distributed by the NHS - and Gardasil which is produced by Merck and distributed in the U.S.

A Department of Health spokesman said: 'It is wrong to suggest the benefits are exaggerated. Ninety nine per cent of cervical cancer cases are caused by HPV and the vaccine will protect against about 70 per cent of them.

'The evidence is that the vaccine is very safe. And long-term follow up studies have shown that it offers extremely high levels of protection that continue to last.'

An initial post mortem showed the vaccine was 'unlikely' to have caused the death of Natalie Morton as she had a rare and grave underlying health problem, which was unknown to her family.

Stepfather Andrew Bullock said Natalie, who attended Blue Coat CofE School, in Coventry, had been 'poorly for some time'.

She had been to see her GP several times and investigations into a mystery illness had been under way, he said.

How Britain went for the £18m cheaper option

Britain's decision to go against the rest of the Western world and opt for the Cervarix vaccine was made to save money, health charities claim.

They said the decision condemned thousands of young women to an unpleasant sexual infection from which they would have been protected had ministers chosen the rival vaccine, Gardasil.

The U.S. and every single major western European country went for Gardasil, which protects against more strains of HPV, the sexual infection which can cause cervical cancer.

It is understood that Britain chose Cervarix after the Health Protection Agency advised that it would save more than £18million a year.

There is no suggestion that Gardasil is any safer than Cervarix. In fact there have been 30 deaths following reported adverse reactions to Gardasil in the U.S., plus a number in Germany and Austria.

But charities pointed out the extra strains of HPV that Gardasil protects against would have prevented thousands from catching genital warts - an infection on the rise, especially among the young.

They said the money saved will be outweighed by the £22million the NHS spends every year treating genital warts.

'Our concern is that we didn't pick the right vaccine in the UK,' said Lisa Power, of the Terrence Higgins Trust sexual health charity. 'We felt that Gardasil was more effective against more things.

'HPV may not be fatal, but it is very unpleasant and it is on the rise. In 2008 there were 92,525 new cases of genital warts. That's very expensive to treat, as well as leaving 92,525 very unhappy people.'

GlaxoSmithKline, which makes Cervarix, claims its vaccine lasts longer than Gardasil, meaning there is less chance of a booster being needed later in life.

....Ends....

Vaccine Autoimmune Project

On 16 September 2008 we heard that the Vaccine Autoimmune Project web site (vaproject.org) had been hacked-into and shut down just ahead of the publication of this article by Dr F Edward Yazbak. We sincerely hope that this reputable and reliable web site will be up and running soon.  

Dr Yazbak, a paediatrician and investigative medical writer has published extensively on regressive autism, vaccine injury, SIDS and Shaken Baby Syndrome.   

The Hornig et al publication reviewed here has been trailed as the study which would resolve the Wakefield controversy: indeed, in the US - when it did ultimately appear - it was hailed by some as the final nail in the coffin of that theory.   

It is surprising that, despite the unrelenting barrage of anti-Wakefield propaganda in the British media since the start of the General Medical Council hearings, the publication of the Hornig study was never mentioned and only picked in the world news of a few UK newspapers.  

So, why might it  be that the Department of Health, the Health Protection Agency, and the usual science lobby organisations, were unwilling to promote the new study in the UK?

 

The Denial of Vaccine Damage by Government,
Corporations, and the Media.
Written by the parents.
In July 2007 the General Medical Council, the regulatory body for doctors in Britain, began a ‘trial’ of Dr Andrew Wakefield,Professor John Walker-Smith and Professor Simon Murch. The three doctors were charged under some seventy headings after having published the conclusion of research and clinical practice that suggested a link between the MMR vaccine, bowel disease and regressive autism in some children.
 
The complainant is a pro-MMR journalist.. The GMC took almost four years to produce the evidence and the hearing itself is expected to last around two years, making it one of the longest proceedings in British history.
 
The parents of MMR vaccine damaged children have not been allowed a voice in the GMC hearing. This book is written almost entirely by these parents and for the first time it gives voice to the injustice that has been done to them and their children.
 
Price £8.00 plus postage and packaging.
For more information, or to purchase the book, click here.
 
 

Welcome to the new style JABS website which we hope will be more accessible for all our members and visitors. We have made a number of changes so that information is easier to find and we would welcome your comments, good or bad, by emailing jackie@jabs.org.uk . We would like to say a great big thank you to Alice at Hat Day Designs for the new JABS website design, and to the Datasmith team for their hard work, patience and commitment in pulling it all together.

- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

JABS offers visitors to this site information based on parents' experiences. Well- informed parents whose children have suffered side effects and long-term damage from vaccination. Parents who choose to make their voices heard and campaign to raise awareness. This site is for people who want to change things for the better, not retain the status quo.

















JABS is funded only by donation from well-wishers and those that find JABS helpful. Please help if you can by clicking here.

and.